The Quantum Architects

How Hund and Mulliken Rewrote Chemistry's Rulebook

Article Navigation

Imagine a world where chemists couldn't explain why oxygen sticks to a magnet or why metals conduct electricity. Before molecular orbital (MO) theory, chemistry was a science of reactions without a language for bonds. This is the story of two physicists who unlocked molecules' secrets—and the autobiography that immortalized their quest.

The Unlikely Partnership That Forged a New Chemistry

Friedrich Hund: The Quantum Cartographer

German physicist Friedrich Hund (1896–1997) began his career in an era when atoms were cosmic puzzles. Trained under quantum pioneers like Max Born and Niels Bohr, he navigated the chaos of post-war Europe to lay MO theory's foundations.

Hund's Rules (1925)

Govern electron behavior in atoms, explaining magnetic properties 1

Quantum Tunneling (1926)

Discovered quantum particles "burrowing" through barriers—a concept vital for modern semiconductors 1

Hund's Paradox (1929)

Questioned why chiral molecules (like DNA) favor left- or right-handed forms, later solved by quantum decoherence 1

But his masterstroke came in 1927. By treating molecules as unified quantum systems—not just bonded atoms—he birthed MO theory's core vision.

Robert Mulliken: The American Spectroscopist

While Hund theorized, Robert Mulliken (1896–1986) dissected light. His experiments with molecular spectra revealed patterns valence bond (VB) theory couldn't explain.

"Hund's ideas were the lightning strike. Without him, MO theory might have remained a footnote." — Robert Mulliken, Life of a Scientist 3 6

During 1920s European pilgrimages, he met Hund. Their collaboration fused:

  • Spectroscopy data (Mulliken) + Quantum mechanics (Hund)
  • A shared conviction: Electrons belong to the molecule, not atoms 3 8

The Experiment That Shattered Old Paradigms: Oxygen's Paramagnetism

Why It Mattered

Valence bond theory depicted oxygen (O₂) with paired electrons—implying it should be diamagnetic (repel magnets). But liquid oxygen leaped toward magnets. Chemists had no explanation until MO theory.

Methodology: Decoding Oxygen's Electron "Fingerprint"

  1. Light as Probe: Shoot ultraviolet light at O₂ gas, forcing electrons to jump orbitals 2 4
  2. Spectral Analysis: Measure absorbed wavelengths (revealing energy gaps between orbitals)
  3. MO Diagram Construction: Map electrons using Hund's Rule: "Electrons occupy orbitals singly before pairing" 4
MO diagram of oxygen
Molecular orbital diagram of oxygen showing unpaired electrons in π* orbitals

Results & Revolution

  • Unpaired Electrons: MO diagrams showed two electrons in separate π* orbitals (parallel spins)
  • Bond Order = (Bonding e⁻ – Antibonding e⁻)/2 = (10-6)/2 = 2 (confirming O=O bond) 2
  • Paramagnetism Proven: Unpaired electrons align with magnetic fields, pulling O₂ toward magnets 2 5
Table 1: Spectral Evidence for MO Theory
Molecule Observed UV Absorption (nm) Predicted by VB Theory? MO Theory's Explanation
O₂ 242 No (expected diamagnetism) π→π* transition in paramagnetic system
N₂ 145 Yes σ→σ* transition in diamagnetic system
Table 2: Bond Order Predictions
Molecule Bonding e⁻ Antibonding e⁻ Bond Order Stability
H₂⁺ 1 0 0.5 Low
H₂ 2 0 1 High
O₂ 10 6 2 High

The Scientist's Toolkit: 1920s Quantum Chemistry Lab

MO theory's birth relied on analog tools—many still used today. Life of a Scientist details these "reagents" 3 6 :

Tool/Concept Function Modern Equivalent
Vacuum Tube Spectroscope Split light into wavelengths to probe electron jumps UV-Vis Spectrophotometers
Slater Determinants Calculate multi-electron wave functions Quantum computing algorithms
Hückel's Pi-Orbital Math Simplify MO calculations for organic molecules Computational chemistry software (Gaussian)
Lewis' Dot Structures Visualize electron pairs (VB theory's framework) MO diagram software (Avogadro)
Vintage spectroscope
1930s vacuum tube spectroscope used in early MO theory experiments
Modern computational chemistry
Modern computational chemistry software descended from Hund and Mulliken's work

Legacy: From Textbook Rules to Quantum Technologies

The VB-MO Rivalry

Initially, Linus Pauling's VB theory dominated—it mirrored chemists' bond-centric intuition. MO theory's abstract "delocalized electrons" faced skepticism 8 . Mulliken's 1966 Nobel Prize vindicated MO theory, yet he insisted: "Hund deserved a share." 1 7

Why MO Theory Won

Predictive Power

Explained oxygen's magnetism, benzene's stability, metals' conductivity 2 5

Computational Edge

MO-based software (like Gaussian) now models drugs, materials, and reactions

Quantum Revolution

Tunnel effects (Hund's discovery) enable microscopes imaging atoms and quantum computers 1

Hund's Echo in Modern Science

  • Chiral molecule manipulation (resolving his paradox) enables life-saving drugs 1
  • MO diagrams guide solar cell design and superconductors 5
Conclusion: The Human Face of Quantum Leaps

Life of a Scientist isn't just a chronicle of equations. It reveals science as a human drama: Mulliken's European travels, Hund's defiance of Nazi pressures, and letters debating orbital symmetries over coffee. Their partnership shows how theory + experiment + persistence rewrote chemistry.

Today, MO theory's language—bond orders, electron densities, HOMO/LUMO gaps—is the chemist's alphabet. As you read this, electrons dance in orbitals predicted by two men who dared to reimagine bonds. Their autobiography reminds us: Behind every rule in textbooks lies a story of struggle and wonder.

"Chemistry is the science of electrons. Understand their address, and you hold the key to matter." — Adapted from Robert Mulliken's Life of a Scientist 3 6

References